Multimedia
Blogs
Forum
Affordable HD
Whitepapers
Newsletters
Events
Advertisers
DCP Directory
MillimeterDistribute Expertise: Blu-ray Blues
Jun 1, 2008 12:00 PM, By Jan Ozer
Navigating the troublesome realities of Blu-ray licensing and distribution.
Whenever Blu-ray comes up, there are questions about authoring. But equally daunting are the issues of distribution and the licensing costs associated with Blu-ray replication. After reviewing contracts and FAQs on the websites for the Advanced Access Content System (AACS) and Blu-ray Disc Association (BDA), I could see why there was a lot of confusion about costs — the materials are dense and confusing.
To clarify the licensing issues, I spoke with representatives with both associations, and I detail my findings below. Before discussing these fees, however, let's review why licensing related to Blu-ray replication is relevant for small and large producers alike.
At a high level, you have two choices for producing Blu-ray Discs: You can produce multiple recordable discs either via your own recorder or a service bureau, or you can replicate at the same kind of facility that Hollywood uses to produce its mass-market Blu-ray Discs. This article outlines the pros and cons — as well as the licensing issues — of both.
Blu-ray recordable discs are still quite expensive, but more importantly, recordable discs don't play reliably across the range of Blu-ray players. Judging from personal experience, and from the forums and message boards, it's clear that many producers share my pain. Overall, playback compatibility is generally manageable when producing for one or two known players, but it quickly gets out of control once distribution broadens.
For example, suppose you were tasked with producing 100 Blu-ray single-layer discs to send to clients or remote offices or your far-flung sales team. Let's ignore the authoring and licensing costs for a moment and look strictly at disc-reproduction costs. If you jobbed the entire production out to a service bureau, you'd end up paying between $3,500 and $4,000 (see duplicationondemand.com).
If you produced the recordable discs inhouse, you could probably buy the media for about $1,200 to $1,500, but then you'd need to manually reproduce and print them, which means buying a Blu-ray printer/recorder, which starts at about $3,000 (see primera.com). It probably makes better economic sense to buy the printer/recorder and reproduce the discs yourself, but either way, you'd end up with 100 discs that wouldn't play reliably in the field. Factor in the tech support costs associated with playback failures — but more importantly, the potential damage to your corporate image — and this approach quickly becomes scary.
Your alternative is to have the discs replicated like Hollywood movies. At 1,000-unit quantities, the cost for printed Blu-ray Discs is around $2,950 with a $500 setup charge, for a total of just less than $3,500 — about the same as a service bureau. Sure, it's a couple of thousand dollars more expensive than recording and printing the discs yourself (not taking into account the price of the printer/recorder), but the discs should play reliably on all Blu-ray players.
The authoring side of replication
If you're at all familiar with Blu-ray production, you're probably muttering to yourself, “Yeah, but what about the $40 grand I'd need to spend on an authoring program that would allow me to replicate my disks?” Well, now you have several options outside of Sony Blu-print or Sonic Solutions Scenarist. First, you can rent a Blu-ray authoring program called DoStudio from NetBlender for $295 a month. Second, at NAB, Sonic Solutions announced that $299 authoring tool DVDitHD would support AACS and exporting to the Cutting Master Format, which should enable projects to be replicated.
Note that DVDitHD extends the DVD+R/-R feature set to DVD, and doesn't support Blu-ray features such as Blu-ray Java, overlays, or picture-in-picture. Still, this should be sufficient for most corporate or indie-type productions — especially if it means saving $40,000. Bottom line: The authoring side of the equation won't be cost-prohibitive in the short term, leaving the licensing side as the most significant cost that varies between replication and reproduction. So let's jump to the licensing side.
Advanced Access Content System
AACS is encryption technology that must be included on every replicated Blu-ray Disc. Fees and licenses are administered by the AACS Licensing Administrator, which you can find at aacsla.com.
I'd be remiss if I didn't mention that AACS has reportedly been hacked by at least one offshore software developer. Specifically, Antigua-based SlySoft currently sells a program called AnyDVD HD, which the company claims removes both AACS and BD+ copy protection — the latter an optional technology that's not mandatory for disc replication. Note that AACS can be updated, so the current hack will likely be overcome — although, of course, there's no guarantee that future AACS versions won't be hacked.
AACS has a fixed, one-time cost of $3,000, then a per-project cost of about $1,585. This covers the content certificate that actually contains the license, a setup fee, and some smaller additional fees. The $1,585 is a pass-through collected by the replicator and paid to the AACS, so you should definitely complain if the replicator wants to charge much more than $1,585.
AACS also charges 4 cents per disc, which the replicator will generally collect and pay through to the AACS. Some replicators charge an administration fee of 1 cent per disc or more to collect and pay those charges.
